IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER UPGRADE
There is a 40% upgrade discount for all prior license holders and their original purchase order number can be used as a coupon code for the discount.Eking the Most out of X-Trans: Can Free Software Beat Iridient? This new X-Transformer release is a paid upgrade for users who are beyond the 18 month free upgrade period and last purchased a license prior to May 1, 2020. Best settings for iridient x transformer upgrade# In my previous article, X-Trans: The Promise and the Problem, which focused on the difficulty of demosaicking FujiFilm’s X-Trans sensor data while preserving fine color detail and in particular the trouble FujiFilm’s own image processing pipeline has with it, I used the Free/Libre software Darktable to process the RAW examples. I showed that, specifically in terms of color detail, Darktable was able to do a better job than FujiFilm’s own processing. (But I also pointed out the compromise between color detail and false color/m oiré inherent in X-Trans.) Several commenters suggested that I could get better results from a commercial software product called called Iridient Developer (which, it should be noted for those yet unaware, cannot be installed into your FujiFilm camera’s firmware in order to improve its JPEG output). Iridient has become a popular alternative/adjunct to Adobe’s Lightroom for FujiFilm X-Series camera users who wish to process RAW files, due not so much to Iridient’s excellence as to Lightroom’s inadequacy in desmosaicking X-Trans images. (I don’t have access to Lightroom and therefore cannot provide my own example of its output, but a simple web search will provide you with more than you need to confirm this assertion.)Īdmitting that if we want to preserve fine color detail we must abandon the camera JPEG output, the question remains: which raw processing software will provide the best results? While everyone seems to agree that Iridient is better than Lightroom, the question has never been answered as to whether or not it is better than Darktable. Since this is clearly a subject still mired in confusion, I thought it would make an interesting topic for another article.
I’ve seen the results of several shootouts between Lightroom, FujiFilm JPEGs, and Iridient, and I know from my own experience that Darktable’s output is very similar to Iridient’s (as exemplified in the aforementioned), but I haven’t come across any direct comparisons - which isn’t very surprising considering the fact that Darktable is not a commercial product and nothing is to be gained financially from promoting its use. In this article, we will explore the differences and similarities as they relate to image quality, in particular the quality of luminance detail. Note that Darktable, dcraw, UFRaw, RawTherapee, and perhaps other Free Software RAW processors, all use Frank Markesteijn’s algorithm for demosaicking X-Trans images, so similar results can be achieved with any of them, but we’ll focus on Darktable here because it is, in my opinion, the most capable and mature, and the program I use the most personally.
Best settings for iridient x transformer software#īest settings for iridient x transformer software#.Best settings for iridient x transformer upgrade#.Best settings for iridient x transformer update#.There's another forum with slightly more information available (even the developer of IXT contributing) and I have asked this question there but no answer so far. I also doubt that vignetting and Distortion correction are working as intended - the dng files apart from CA always have a slight vignetting compared to the raf even when the box is ticked in IXT, and distortion is hard to tell, I suppose the lens that I was testing with produces very little distortion anyway but basically there's no difference whether this option is turned on or off. ACR (or Lightroom) does much better in this and the in-camera converter does even better obviously. What is your experience with the Lens Correction / Chromatic Aberration setting? In my testing it did not do much. I have also run some tests with x-t10 files and it seems that we are on the same page here. This is just a base starting point, prior to any further processing, but it makes a freshly converted X file look perfect. Please have a read, and let me know what you think! I think the results are wonderful, but would love to hear others opinions. I was searching everywhere for suggested settings, but it being such a new product I was unable to find any real direction. I did some rather rigorous testing over the past couple of days, to see if I can find an optimal starting point when working with Iridient + Lightroom. I've just written up a new blog post here, outlining the settings I've worked out to get the most out of Iridient Digital's new X-Transformer conversion software.
0 kommentar(er)
